General
Matilda E. Starbuck et al., as Executors of William H. Starbuck, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Phenix Insurance Company of Brooklyn, N. Y., Appellant
166 N.Y. 593·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Matilda E. Starbuck et al., as Executors of William H. Starbuck, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Phenix Insurance Company of Brooklyn, N. Y., Appellant.
Starbuck v. Phenix Ins. Co., 47 App. Div. 621, affirmed.
(Argued February 11, 1901;
decided March 1, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 5, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
R. D. Benedict for appellant.
Artemas H. Holmes for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Gray, J.