Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. J. CARROLL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. J. J. CARROLL; Mrs. A. L. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Mrs. A. L. CARTER; Mrs. E. A. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Mrs. E. A. CARTER; Lillie N. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Lillie N. CARTER; Frank Haywood NELMS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Frank Haywood NELMS; R. D. RANDOLPH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. R. D. RANDOLPH; Judson L. TAYLOR v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Judson L. TAYLOR; A. L. CARTER, Administrator of Estate of Maude H. Carter, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. A. L. CARTER, Administrator of Estate of Maude H. Carter; Lena Carter CARROLL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; A. L. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; W. T. CARTER, Jr., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; Mrs. Frank Haywood NELMS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; Frankie Carter RANDOLPH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; Jessie Carter TAYLOR v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1934 — 70 F.2d 810 · caselaw · US
Tax
J. J. CARROLL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. J. J. CARROLL; Mrs. A. L. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Mrs. A. L. CARTER; Mrs. E. A. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Mrs. E. A. CARTER; Lillie N. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Lillie N. CARTER; Frank Haywood NELMS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Frank Haywood NELMS; R. D. RANDOLPH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. R. D. RANDOLPH; Judson L. TAYLOR v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Judson L. TAYLOR; A. L. CARTER, Administrator of Estate of Maude H. Carter, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. A. L. CARTER, Administrator of Estate of Maude H. Carter; Lena Carter CARROLL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; A. L. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; W. T. CARTER, Jr., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; Mrs. Frank Haywood NELMS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; Frankie Carter RANDOLPH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; Jessie Carter TAYLOR v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
70 F.2d 810·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. J. CARROLL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. J. J. CARROLL. Mrs. A. L. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Mrs. A. L. CARTER. Mrs. E. A. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Mrs. E. A. CARTER. Lillie N. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Lillie N. CARTER. Frank Haywood NELMS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Frank Haywood NELMS. R. D. RANDOLPH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. R. D. RANDOLPH. Judson L. TAYLOR v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Judson L. TAYLOR. A. L. CARTER, Administrator of Estate of Maude H. Carter, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. A. L. CARTER, Administrator of Estate of Maude H. Carter. Lena Carter CARROLL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. A. L. CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. W. T. CARTER, Jr., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. Mrs. Frank Haywood NELMS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. Frankie Carter RANDOLPH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. Jessie Carter TAYLOR v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
Nos. 7228-7241
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 26, 1934.
Palmer Hutcheson, of Houston, Tex., and Moultrie Hitt and G. Kibby Munson, both of Washington, D. C., for taxpayers.
Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and J. P. Jackson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and E. Barrett Prettyman, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and J. M. Leinenkugel, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and WALKER,' Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The parties to the above numbered and entitled causes by written stipulation filed therein having agreed that the decision of this court mthefirstabovenumbered and entitled cause (70 F.(2d) 806) will control and be aecepted by tbe parties to the other above numbered and entitled causes; and this court bavhig rendered its decision in the first above numbered and entitled cause whereby the petition for review filed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in that cause was denied, and the petition for review filed therein by J. J. Carroll was granted, and the order under review therein was reversed and that cause was remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court rendered therein; it is ordered that the petition for review filed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in each of the other above numbered and entitled causes be, and the same is, denied, and that the petition for review filed in each of said other above numbered and entitled causes by the other party thereto be, and the same is, granted, that the order under review therein be reversed, and that each of said other above numbered and entitled causes be remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court rendered in the first above numbered and entitled cause.
[DISSENT — FOSTER, Circuit Judge]
FOSTER, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
I concur in so far as the petitions of the Commissioner are denied, but I am unable to agree in the conclusions of the majority as to the other petitions.