Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LAFAYETTE DEVELOPMENT CO., Inc., et al. v. BIECKER, 1930 — 45 F.2d 165 · caselaw · US
Corporations
LAFAYETTE DEVELOPMENT CO., Inc., et al. v. BIECKER
45 F.2d 165·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1930
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LAFAYETTE DEVELOPMENT CO., Inc., et al. v. BIECKER.
No. 6025.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 5, 1930.
Allison E. Palmer, of Orlando, Fla., for appellants.
Hugh Akerman and Claude L. Gray, both of O'rlando, Fla. (Claude L. Gray, of Orlando, Fla., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
An appeal was taken in this suit from an order appointing a receiver, and temporarily enjoining certain officers and directors of the Lafayette Development Company, a corporation, from selling or disposing of the property of that corporation. No citation was issued. The transcript of record was not filed until after tho return day, and no extension of time for filing was applied for or granted, as required by rules XIV(5) and XVI (1) of the rules of this court.
On motion of appellee, the appeal is dismissed.