Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph Van Camp, Respondent, v. Edward P. Searle, as Late Sheriff, et al., Impleaded with John G. Sawyer and The Orleans County National Bank, Appellants, et al., Respondents, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 600 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph Van Camp, Respondent, v. Edward P. Searle, as Late Sheriff, et al., Impleaded with John G. Sawyer and The Orleans County National Bank, Appellants, et al., Respondents
149 N.Y. 600·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Van Camp, Respondent, v. Edward P. Searle, as Late Sheriff, et al., Impleaded with John G. Sawyer and The Orleans County National Bank, Appellants, et al., Respondents.
(Submitted May 25, 1896;
decided June 2, 1896.)
Motion for re-argument denied, with costs, but the remittitur ordered to be amended by inserting “ that the part of the judgment be reversed, as to the appellants, the Orleans County National Bank and John G. Sawyer, which awards payment out of the fund of the Brown judgment.’? (See 147 N. Y. 150.)