Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DEL RIO BANK & TRUST CO. v. CORNELL, 1932 — 57 F.2d 142 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
DEL RIO BANK & TRUST CO. v. CORNELL
57 F.2d 142·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DEL RIO BANK & TRUST CO. v. CORNELL.
No. 6433.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 12, 1932.
Rehearing Denied April 12, 1932.
John J. Foster, of Del Rio, Tex., for appellant.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — WALKER, Circuit Judge.]
WALKER, Circuit Judge.
The court disallowed a claim of the appellant that it was entitled to an equitable lien on laud of the bankrupt which was intended to be included in a deed of trust or mortgage made by the bankrupt to the appellant more than a year prior to the bankruptcy, but by mutual mistake of the parties to that instrument was omitted therefrom. Under the recording laws of Texas the equitable title of the appellant to the omitted land was not required to he recorded in order to protect it against creditors of the bankrupt in whose favor an attachment or an execution on a judgment against the bankrupt was issued. Johnson v. Darr, 114 Tex. 516, 272, S. W. 1098. Under amended section 47a of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 75), the trastee in bankruptcy has tho status of such a creditor, not tho status of a bona fide purchaser for value and without notice. Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co., 280 U. S. 268, 36 S. Ct. 50, 60 L. Ed. 275; Zartman v. First National Bank, 216 U. S. 134, 30 S. Ct. 368, 54 L. Ed. 418. The rights of the trustee in bankruptcy being subordinate to those of the appellant, based on the asserted equitable claim, which was supported by the evidence, tho disallowance of that claim was erroneous.
Tho decree is reversed.