General
AMBROSE et al. v. WELLS et al.
396 U.S. 112·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMBROSE et al. v. WELLS et al.
No. 580.
Decided December 8, 1969
John M. Armentano for appellants.
Robert B. McKay for Wells, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, for Rockefeller et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.