Contracts · MBE-tested
REED ENTERPRISES et al. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.
390 U.S. 457·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. · Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
REED ENTERPRISES et al. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.
No. 1092.
Decided March 25, 1968.
Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.