Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Merchants Matrix Cut Syndicate, Inc. et al. v. United States et al., 1955 — 349 U.S. 945 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Merchants Matrix Cut Syndicate, Inc. et al. v. United States et al.
349 U.S. 945·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 732.
Merchants Matrix Cut Syndicate, Inc. et al. v. United States et al.
Charles L. Stewart, Jr. for the Intertype Corporation, and Horace A. Young for the Advertising Checking Bureau, Inc., petitioners.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Morton and John C. Harrington for the United States. Claude A. Roth for the Clark-Congress Corporation, respondent.
Mr. Sobeloff, Mr. Morton and S. Billingsley Hill filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Clark-Congress Corporation.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.