General
The Lackawanna Mills, Respondent, v. Samuel Weil et al., Composing the firm of Weil, Haskell and Company, Appellants
162 N.Y. 642·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Lackawanna Mills, Respondent, v. Samuel Weil et al., Composing the firm of Weil, Haskell and Company, Appellants.
Lackawanna Mills v. Weil, 21 App. Div. 492, affirmed.
(Argued March 28, 1900;
decided April 17, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered, respectively, October 30 and October 29, 1897, modifying and affirming, as modified, a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirming an order denying a motion for a new trial.
B. F. Einstein for appellants.
A. A. Spear for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.