Contracts · MBE-tested
ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY
357 U.S. 575·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY.
No. 513,
Misc.
Decided June 30, 1958.
Petitioners pro se.
John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 596, Mise.
Together with No. 596, Misc., Woods v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same Court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.