Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Max CAYTON, Appellant, v. Merton A. ENGLISH, Appellee, 1927 — 23 F.2d 749 · caselaw · US
General
Max CAYTON, Appellant, v. Merton A. ENGLISH, Appellee
23 F.2d 749·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Max CAYTON, Appellant, v. Merton A. ENGLISH, Appellee.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted November 9, 1927.
Decided December 5, 1927.
No. 4557.
Alex Wolf, Nathan Cayton, and T. M. Wampler, ¿11 of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
P. B. Morehouse and E. L. Williams, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MAETIN, Chief Justice, and EOBB and VAN OESDBL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — ROBB, Associate Justice.]
ROBB, Associate Justice.
The plaintiff, appellant here, is the husband of the plaintiff and appellant in appeal No. 4-556, 57 App. D. C.-, 23 F.(2d) 745, just decided, and brought this action for loss of services. The decision in the preceding case being controlling here, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Affirmed.