Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Burr Mattice, Respondent, v. Henry Wilcox, Appellant, 1891 — 129 N.Y. 633 · caselaw · US
General
Burr Mattice, Respondent, v. Henry Wilcox, Appellant
129 N.Y. 633·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Burr Mattice, Respondent, v. Henry Wilcox, Appellant.
(Argued October 30, 1891;
decided December 8, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made February 3, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon an order of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to a part of defendant’s answer.
F. R. Gilbert for appellant.
Douglas W. Miller for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.