Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States et al. v. Interstate Common Carrier Council of Maryland, Inc. et al.; and Schreiber Trucking Co., Inc. v. Interstate Common Carrier Council of Maryland, Inc. et al., 1949 — 338 U.S. 843 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States et al. v. Interstate Common Carrier Council of Maryland, Inc. et al.; and Schreiber Trucking Co., Inc. v. Interstate Common Carrier Council of Maryland, Inc. et al.
338 U.S. 843·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Reed are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set down for argument. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 265.
No. 266.
United States et al. v. Interstate Common Carrier Council of Maryland, Inc. et al.; and Schreiber Trucking Co., Inc. v. Interstate Common Carrier Council of Maryland, Inc. et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. Florida v. United States, 282 U. S. 194; United States v. Carolina Carriers Corp., 315 U. S. 475.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Reed are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set down for argument. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Solicitor General Perlman and Daniel W. Knowlton for appellants in No. 265. Hall Hammond for appellant in No. 266. John R. Norris for appellees.