Bankruptcy
In the Matter of the Application of Julius E. Schick, a Bankrupt, to Have a Certain Judgment in Favor of Samuel Goldstein Canceled of Record. Samuel Goldstein, Respondent; Julius E. Schick, Appellant
244 A.D. 742·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Julius E. Schick, a Bankrupt, to Have a Certain Judgment in Favor of Samuel Goldstein Canceled of Record. Samuel Goldstein, Respondent; Julius E. Schick, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.