General
LOUDEN v. UTAH
379 U.S. 1·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LOUDEN v. UTAH.
No. 6,
Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.
George H. Searle for petitioner.
A. Pratt Kesler, Attorney General of Utah, and Ronald N. Boyce, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma -pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Utah, for further proceedings in light of Stoner v. California, 376 U. S. 483.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.