Contracts · MBE-tested
Tripo Krstovic, Appellant, v. Charles H. Van Buren and Samuel W. Day, Copartners, Doing Business under the Name and Style of C. H. Van Buren & Co., Respondents
194 A.D. 942·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1920·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Tripo Krstovic, Appellant, v. Charles H. Van Buren and Samuel W. Day, Copartners, Doing Business under the Name and Style of C. H. Van Buren & Co., Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence, including the correspondence between the defendants and Kline, presented a question for the consideration of the jury. All concur.