Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clara B. Druar, as Executrix of John Druar, Deceased, Respondent, v. Robert W. Jones et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 558 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Clara B. Druar, as Executrix of John Druar, Deceased, Respondent, v. Robert W. Jones et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another
185 N.Y. 558·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clara B. Druar, as Executrix of John Druar, Deceased, Respondent, v. Robert W. Jones et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
Druar v. Jones, 107 App. Div. 631, affirmed.
(Argued April 27, 1906;
decided May 15, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 26, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover for work performed and materials furnished pursuant to an alleged verbal contract.
Adelbert Moot, William M. Wheeler and George C. Riley for appellants.
Henry W. Killeen and John B. Druar for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.