Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank Ehrenfried, as Administrator of the Estate of Charles A. Ehrenfried, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Lackawanna Iron and Steel Company, Respondent, 1904 — 180 N.Y. 515 · caselaw · US
General
Frank Ehrenfried, as Administrator of the Estate of Charles A. Ehrenfried, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Lackawanna Iron and Steel Company, Respondent
180 N.Y. 515·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank Ehrenfried, as Administrator of the Estate of Charles A. Ehrenfried, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Lackawanna Iron and Steel Company, Respondent.
Ehrenfried v. Lackawanna Iron & Steel Go., 89 App. Div. 130, affirmed.
(Argued December 2, 1904;
decided December 16, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 17, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Thomas A. Sullivan for appellant.
Louis L. Babcock for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.