Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Theresa Storm et al., Appellants, v. Sophia McGrover et al., Individually and as Administrators of Caroline Preiss, Deceased, et al., Respondents, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 531 · caselaw · US
General
Theresa Storm et al., Appellants, v. Sophia McGrover et al., Individually and as Administrators of Caroline Preiss, Deceased, et al., Respondents
187 N.Y. 531·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Theresa Storm et al., Appellants, v. Sophia McGrover et al., Individually and as Administrators of Caroline Preiss, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Reported below, 70 App. Div. 33.
(Argued January 7, 1907;
decided January 15, 1907.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 12, 1902, reversing an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal had been erroneously taken, the Court of Appeals not having jurisdiction to entertain the same.
Robert H. Barnett for motion.
Eugene Cohn and Frank M. Patterson opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, without costs.