Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES ex rel. Marcos TETONIS v. Frances PERKINS, Secretary of Labor, et al., 1935 — 75 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES ex rel. Marcos TETONIS v. Frances PERKINS, Secretary of Labor, et al.
75 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES ex rel. Marcos TETONIS v. Frances PERKINS, Secretary of Labor, et al.
No. 5461.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Feb. 18, 1935.
David B. Fawcett and Ward Bonsall, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
D. Lloyd Claycomb, Asst. U. S. Atty., Horatio S. Dumbauld, U. S. Atty., and James I. Marsh, Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In the court below the petition for a writ of habeas corpus of Marcos Tetonis, a subject of Greece and a deserting seaman, who entered the country without an immigration visa, was dismissed. The opinion of the hearing judge fully discussed the case and justified the court’s order. Agreeing thereto as we do, and as no new principle or precedent is involved, we avoid needless repetition by limiting ourselves to affirming on the trial judge’s opinion.