Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Trimble et al. v. Justice et al., Executors, et al., 1944 — 321 U.S. 747 · caselaw · US
General
Trimble et al. v. Justice et al., Executors, et al.
321 U.S. 747·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 577.
Trimble et al. v. Justice et al., Executors, et al.
February 14, 1944.
Mr. J. Smith Hays for appellants-petitioners. Messrs. LeWright Browning and J. J. Moore for appelleesrespondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from and on petition for writ of certiorari to the Court- of Appeals of Kentucky.
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file the statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (a). The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.