Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v. Armour & Co., 1962 — 370 U.S. 920 · caselaw · US
General
Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v. Armour & Co.
370 U.S. 920·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 952.
Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v. Armour & Co.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, John G. Laughlin, Jr. and Sherman L. Cohn for petitioners. Herbert Brownell, Thomas F. Daly, Harry A. Inman and George E. Leonard for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.