General
MATHEY BROS., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent
30 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MATHEY BROS., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Decided February 18, 1929.
No. 170.
Moore, Hall, Swan & Cunningham, of New York City (John H. Jackson, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Davidson, Moses & Sicher, of New York City (Nathan L. Miller, Harold Otis, and Dudley F. Sicher, all of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.