Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Kind et al., Trustees; and Kind et al., Trustees, v. Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, 1947 — 332 U.S. 808 · caselaw · US
General
Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Kind et al., Trustees; and Kind et al., Trustees, v. Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian
332 U.S. 808·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 309.
Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Kind et al., Trustees; and Kind et al., Trustees, v. Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian.
No. 326.
Solicitor General Perl-man for petitioner in No. 309, with whom Assistant Attorney General Bazelon, M. S. Isenbergh, Stanley M. Silverberg and Joseph W. Bishop, Jr. were on the brief for respondent in No. 326.
Arnold T. Koch for petitioners in No. 326.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.