Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. Carl Schurz et al., Appellants, v. Frederick Cook, Secretary of State, etc., Respondent, 1888 — 111 N.Y. 688 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. Carl Schurz et al., Appellants, v. Frederick Cook, Secretary of State, etc., Respondent
111 N.Y. 688·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. Carl Schurz et al., Appellants, v. Frederick Cook, Secretary of State, etc., Respondent.
(Argued December 11, 1888;
decided December 18, 1888.)
Motion to amend remittitur by stating therein the grounds of the decision upon papers showing the intent of the relator to appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States.
George Zahriskie for motion.
Charles F. Tabor, attorney-general, opposed
[MAJORITY]
■“ Agree to deny motion on the ground that the relator can procure the transmission of a duly authenticated copy of the opinion of the court with the record for use by the United States Supreme Court.”
All concur.
Motion denied.