Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY OF LEBANON, Petitioner, v. Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1934 — 70 F.2d 291 · caselaw · US
Tax
PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY OF LEBANON, Petitioner, v. Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
70 F.2d 291·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY OF LEBANON, Petitioner, v. Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
No. 5961.
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Argued Jan. 16, 1934.
Decided March 12, 1934.
Rehearing Denied April 9, 1934.
Samuel A. Syme, of Washington, D. C., and J. R. Collins, of New York City, for petitioner.
C. M. Charest, J. Louis Monarch, Shelby S. Faulkner, W. R. Lansford, Sewall Key, and John H. MeEvers, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — MARTIN, Chief Justice.]
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
This case involves in principle the identical questions heard and decided by us in Beneficial Loan Society of Trenton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 63 App. D. C. 122, 70 F.(2d) 288, and the eases were argued and submitted together.
In accordance with our opinion and decision handed down concurrently herewith in the former ease, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals herein appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.