General
Valentine Huber, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jennings-Heywood Oil Syndicate et al.
201 U.S. 641·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 30.
Valentine Huber, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jennings-Heywood Oil Syndicate et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.
Submitted March 1, 1906.
Decided March 5, 1906.
Mr. Branch K. Miller, Mr. James L. Dorman and Mr. D. Caffery, Jr., for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Gilbert L. Dupré for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Capital City Dairy Company v. Ohio, 183 U. S. 238; Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172; Chapin v. Eye, 179 U. S. 127; Turner v. Richardson, 180 U. S. 87; Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291, 308; Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Southern Pacific Company, 137 U. S. 48.