Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Asa L. Rogers, Appellant, v. John J. Hardy, Respondent, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 738 · caselaw · US
General
Asa L. Rogers, Appellant, v. John J. Hardy, Respondent
158 N.Y. 738·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Asa L. Rogers, Appellant, v. John J. Hardy, Respondent.
(Argued March 21, 1899;
decided April 18, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the General Term of the late City Court of Brooklyn, entered October 31,1895, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Rogers v. Hardy, 14 Misc. Rep. 220, affirmed,
John Larlcin for appellant.
Ed/ward M. Grout for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.