Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Greene v. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, 1982 — 455 U.S. 1035 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Greene v. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District
455 U.S. 1035·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Justice Brennan, Justice White, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Powell would grant certiorari, vacate the judgment, and remand the case for further consideration in light of In re R. M. J., ante, p. 191.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 81-1406.
Greene v. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. App. N. Y. Certio-rari denied.
Justice Brennan, Justice White, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Powell would grant certiorari, vacate the judgment, and remand the case for further consideration in light of In re R. M. J., ante, p. 191.