Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al. v. United Transport Service Employees et al., 1944 — 320 U.S. 816 · caselaw · US
General
Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al. v. United Transport Service Employees et al.
320 U.S. 816·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Mr. Justice Rutledge is of opinion that the petition for rehearing should be granted, the case restored to the docket and set for argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 435.
Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al. v. United Transport Service Employees et al.
January 10, 1944.
Mr. Justice Rutledge is of opinion that the petition for rehearing should be granted, the case restored to the docket and set for argument.