General
Sarah Schwartz, as Administratrix, etc., of Herman Schwartz, Deceased, Respondent, v. George Lippman and Martin Haase, Appellants
124 A.D. 935·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah Schwartz, as Administratrix, etc., of Herman Schwartz, Deceased, Respondent, v. George Lippman and Martin Haase, Appellants.
Appeal from part of an order entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 14th day of December, 1907, granting motion for a bill of particulars.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The appeal should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs-arid disbursements, upon the ground that the order was entered upon the motion of the plaintiff; hut without prejudice to a motion for a resettlement of the order, or for a renewal of the application for a bill of particulars at the Special Term on proper papers. Present — Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Appeal dismissed, with, ten dollars costs and disbursements.