Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Utilities Insurance Co. v. Potter et al., 1941 — 312 U.S. 662 · caselaw · US
General
Utilities Insurance Co. v. Potter et al.
312 U.S. 662·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 625.
Utilities Insurance Co. v. Potter et al.
Argued February 13, 1941.
Decided March 17, 1941.
Mr. Clayton B. Pierce for petitioner. Mr. John W. Barry for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The writ of certiorari is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma rests upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Atlantic Coast Line v. Mims, 242 U. S. 532, 535; Nevada-California-Oregon Ry. v. Burrus, 244 U. S. 103, 105; Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 249 U. S. 490, 492-493.