Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dana et al. v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc., et al., 1961 — 368 U.S. 897 · caselaw · US
General
Dana et al. v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc., et al.
368 U.S. 897·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 343.
Dana et al. v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc., et al.
Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Alan Miles Ruben, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioners. Edwin P. Rome for William Goldman Theatres, Inc., et al., and William A. Schnader, Bernard G. Segal, Arlin M. Adams and Samuel D. Slade for Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.