Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Woodside Water Company, Appellant, v. Long Island City, Respondent, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 558 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The Woodside Water Company, Appellant, v. Long Island City, Respondent
159 N.Y. 558·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Woodside Water Company, Appellant, v. Long Island City, Respondent.
Woodside Water Co. v. Long Island, Cily, 23 App. Div. 78, affirmed.
(Submitted May 10, 1899;
decided June 6,1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 30, 1897, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special.Term.
F. 3. Van Vechten for appellant.
John Whalen, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Corvnoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.