Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Succession Tax on a Trust Fund Created by the Third Item of the Last Will and Testament of Henry B. Gibson, Deceased. James A. Roberts, Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; James M. Smith et al., Respondents, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 680 · caselaw · US
Tax
In the Matter of the Succession Tax on a Trust Fund Created by the Third Item of the Last Will and Testament of Henry B. Gibson, Deceased. James A. Roberts, Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; James M. Smith et al., Respondents
157 N.Y. 680·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Succession Tax on a Trust Fund Created by the Third Item of the Last Will and Testament of Henry B. Gibson, Deceased. James A. Roberts, Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; James M. Smith et al., Respondents.
Matter of Gibson, 33 App. Div, 628, affirmed.
(Submitted October 5, 1898;
decided October 25, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered September 10, 1898, affirming an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Ontario county adjudging that a trust fund created under the will of Henry B. Gibson, deceased, is not liable to a transfer tax.
Mead, c& Stranaha/n for appellant.
James O. Smith for James M. Smith et al., respondents
Walter Ii. Knapp for Louis H. Gibson, respondent.
D. Q. Lapham for Josephine E. Gibson, respondent.
Wynkoop & Rice for Livingston Lansing et al., respondents.
Frank H. Hamlin for Catherine 0. Lansing et al., respondents.
Jolm A. Barhite for Richard R. Gibson et ah, respondents.
Henry H. Man for William Watts Sherman et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that this case is governed by the decision in the Seaman Case (147 N. Y. 69). The amendment to the Transfer Act (Chap. 284 of the Laws of 1897) did not operate to so change it as to warrant the giving now of a different construction. No opinion.
All concur.