Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
INDIVIGLIO et al. v. UNITED STATES, 1958 — 357 U.S. 574 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
INDIVIGLIO et al. v. UNITED STATES
357 U.S. 574·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
INDIVIGLIO et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 753.
Decided June 30, 1958.
Bernard A. Golding for petitioners.
Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is reversed. Jencks v. United States, 353 U. S. 657. See also Agnello v. United States, 269 U. S. 20, and Giordenello v. United States, ante, p. 480, decided this day.