Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Samuel H. Miller, Appellant, v. James Brown, Respondent, 1876 — 64 N.Y. 641 · caselaw · US
General
Samuel H. Miller, Appellant, v. James Brown, Respondent
64 N.Y. 641·New York Court of Appeals·1876·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel H. Miller, Appellant, v. James Brown, Respondent.
(Submitted February 22, 1876;
decided February 25, 1876.)
George Miller for the appellant.
Strong & Spear for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal. No opinion.
All concur, except Miller, j., taking no part.
Appeal dismissed.