General
John R. Quinn, Respondent, v. Michael O'Keeffe, Appellant
151 N.Y. 633·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John R. Quinn, Respondent, v. Michael O’Keeffe, Appellant.
Reported below, 9 App. Div. 68.
(Argued November 30, 1896;
decided December 8, 1896.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 9, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict rendered in the late City Court of Brooklyn, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the ground that the action was to recover damages for a personal injury, and the affirmance, by the Appellate Division, was unanimous.
James C. Cropsey for motion.
James D. Bell opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted.