Harold A. HAWN, Appellant, v. Philip FRITZ, Appellee

37 F.2d 434·United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·1930

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Harold A. HAWN, Appellant, v. Philip FRITZ, Appellee. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. February 6, 1930. Rehearing Denied. March 3, 1930. Patent Appeal No. 2215. Chappell & Earl, of Kalamazoo, Mich. (F. L. Chappell, of Kalamazoo, Mich., of counsel), for appellant. Frank E. Liveranee, Jr., of Grand Rapids, Mich., and John Boyle, Jr., of Washington, D. C., for appellee. Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and •BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges. [MAJORITY — GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.] GRAHAM, Presiding Judge. The issues in this matter have been fully considered in No. 2214, Philip Fritz v. Harold A. Hawn, 37 F.(2d) 430, decided concurrently herewith, and no further discussion thereof is required. In accordance with our conclusion, expressed in the opinion filed in said No. 2214, the decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.