General
Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co. v. Connecticut Co.
304 U.S. 571·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 959.
Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co. v. Connecticut Co.
May 16, 1938.
Mr. George W. Martin for petitioner.
Messrs. James Garfield and Herman J. Wells for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.