Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
EVCO, dba EVCO Instructional Designs v. Jones, Commissioner of Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico, et al., 1971 — 402 U.S. 969 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
EVCO, dba EVCO Instructional Designs v. Jones, Commissioner of Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico, et al.
402 U.S. 969·Supreme Court of the United States·1971
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 928.
EVCO, dba EVCO Instructional Designs v. Jones, Commissioner of Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico, et al.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. App. N. M. In view of concessions made in brief in opposition filed by the Attorney General of New Mexico, and on examination of the record, certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for reconsideration in light of position asserted by the Attorney General in the brief in opposition.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.