General
Eugene G. Schumann, Respondent, v. The City of New York and William P. McDonald Construction Company, Inc., Defendants, Impleaded with Ernest Lenz and Fred Hesse, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Lenz & Hesse, and Another, Appellants. (Action No. 1.); Eugene G. Schumann, Respondent, v. The City of New York and William P. McDonald Construction Company, Inc., Defendants, Impleaded with Ernest Lenz and Fred Hesse, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Lenz & Hesse, and Another, Appellants. (Action No. 2.)
237 A.D. 843·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1932·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eugene G. Schumann, Respondent, v. The City of New York and William P. McDonald Construction Company, Inc., Defendants, Impleaded with Ernest Lenz and Fred Hesse, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Lenz & Hesse, and Another, Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Eugene G. Schumann, Respondent, v. The City of New York and William P. McDonald Construction Company, Inc., Defendants, Impleaded with Ernest Lenz and Fred Hesse, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Lenz & Hesse, and Another, Appellants. (Action No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
Judgments as modified unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.