Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GIICHI KENOSHITA, Appellant, v. A. E. BURNETT, District Director of Immigration, District No. 31, Appellee, 1933 — 65 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
General
GIICHI KENOSHITA, Appellant, v. A. E. BURNETT, District Director of Immigration, District No. 31, Appellee
65 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GIICHI KENOSHITA, Appellant, v. A. E. BURNETT, District Director of Immigration, District No. 31, Appellee.
No. 7228.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 27, 1933.
J. E. Keating and T. E. Bowen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., and Clyde Thomas, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los An-geles, Cal., for appellee.
Before SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of appellee, ordered appeal herein dismissed for failure of appellant to file reeord and docket cause; mandate forthwith.