General
L'Hommedieu et al. v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York et al.
342 U.S. 951·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent for the reasons stated in their respective dissenting opinions in Adler v. Board of Education, supra, at pp. 496, 497, 508.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 312.
L’Hommedieu et al. v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York et al.
Edward J. Ennis for appellants.
Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney General of New York, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. Adler v.' Board of Education, 342 U. S. 485, decided March 3, 1952.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent for the reasons stated in their respective dissenting opinions in Adler v. Board of Education, supra, at pp. 496, 497, 508.