General
Emeline Lee, Appellant, v. Mary A. Timken, Respondent
156 N.Y. 678·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emeline Lee, Appellant, v. Mary A. Timken, Respondent.
Lee v. TimTcen, 23 App. Div. 349, appeal dismissed.
(Argued June 13, 1898;
decided June 13, 1898.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an interlocutory judgment entered March 23, 1898, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a decision of the court overruling a demurrer to the second defense to the answer on trial at Special Term.
George E. Mott for motion.
V. Wright Kingsley opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed for want of certificate of Appellate Division, as the action is not finally determined, with costs of appeal and ten dollars cost of motion.