Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Samuel.-Beach, et al. Claimants, 1818 — 16 U.S. 77 · caselaw · US
General
The Samuel.-Beach, et al. Claimants
16 U.S. 773 Wheat. 77·Supreme Court of the United States·1818
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(Practice.)
The Samuel.—Beach, et al. Claimants.
A witness offored to be examined, viva voce, in open court,- in an instance cause, ordered to be examined out of court.
This, cause, being -an instance, or revenue c?iuse, had been ordered to farther proof at a former term.
Feb. 3th.
Mr. Baggett, for the claimants,
now offered to produce a witness to be examined, viva voce, in open-court on farther proof; butthe court, for the sake, of convenience, ordered his-deppsition to be taken in writing out of court.
Feb 11th
Vide ante vol. 1 p. 9.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Marshall]
Mr. Chief Justice Marshall
delivered the opinion of the court, reversing the decree ,of condemnation in the court below, and ordering the property to be restored as claimed.'
Decree reversed.