Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New York and Porto Rico Steamship Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. Ochoa y Hermano, etc.; and New York and Porto Rico Steamship Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Successors of M. Lomba & Co., etc., 1904 — 194 U.S. 639 · caselaw · US
General
New York and Porto Rico Steamship Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. Ochoa y Hermano, etc.; and New York and Porto Rico Steamship Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Successors of M. Lomba & Co., etc.
194 U.S. 639·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 241.
No. 242.
New York and Porto Rico Steamship Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. Ochoa y Hermano, etc.; and New York and Porto Rico Steamship Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Successors of M. Lomba & Co., etc.
[MAJORITY]
In error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Porto Rico. April 20, 1904. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. James H. Hayden for plaintiff in error. Mr. John G. Carlisle, Mr. F. Kingsbury Curtis and Mr. Joseph K. McCammon for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. F. H. Dexter for defendants in error.