Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Martha Haines et al., Respondents; James M. Gano et al. Appellants, v. William A. Patterson et al., Respondents. Elizabeth Patterson v. Jane W. McCunn et al. James M. Gano, as Executor, etc., v. Thomas McCunn, as Executor, etc., et al., 1895 — 147 N.Y. 702 · caselaw · US
General
Martha Haines et al., Respondents; James M. Gano et al. Appellants, v. William A. Patterson et al., Respondents. Elizabeth Patterson v. Jane W. McCunn et al. James M. Gano, as Executor, etc., v. Thomas McCunn, as Executor, etc., et al.
147 N.Y. 702·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Martha Haines et al., Respondents; James M. Gano et al. Appellants, v. William A. Patterson et al., Respondents. Elizabeth Patterson v. Jane W. McCunn et al. James M. Gano, as Executor, etc., v. Thomas McCunn, as Executor, etc., et al.
Reported below. 87 Hun, 109.
(Argued October 7, 1895;
decided October 22, 1895.)
Appeals from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made May 17, 1895, which affirmed an order of the Special Term denying application for relief in respect to costs awarded in above-entitled actions.
Preston Stevenson for appellants.
Charles Fox for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.