General
Mary A. Huck, Appellant, v. Rochester Railway Company, Respondent
169 N.Y. 590·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary A. Huck, Appellant, v. Rochester Railway Company, Respondent.
Much v. Rochester By. Co., 43 App. Div. 615, affirmed.
(Argued December 16, 1901;
decided December 31, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment entered September 21,1899, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department overruling plaintiff’s exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment for defendant upon the verdict.
Thomas Ra/mes for appellant.
Charles J. Rissell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight and Cullen, JJ. Dissenting : Landon, J. Not sitting: Werner, J.