Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. ARON & COMPANY, INC., v. MISSISSIPPI SHIPPING COMPANY, INC., 1959 — 361 U.S. 115 · caselaw · US
General
J. ARON & COMPANY, INC., v. MISSISSIPPI SHIPPING COMPANY, INC.
361 U.S. 1154 L. Ed. 2d 148·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. ARON & COMPANY, INC., v. MISSISSIPPI SHIPPING COMPANY, INC.
No. 450.
Decided November 23, 1959.
Eberhard P. Deutsch, Brunswick G. Deutsch and René H. Himel, Jr. ior petitioner.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
It appearing from the petitioner’s suggestion of mootness that, subsequent to the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals of the original interlocutory decree of the District Court and the filing of the petition for writ of certiorari, a consent judgment for damages and costs was entered by the District Court, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal as moot.